(no subject)
Feb. 7th, 2006 09:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I am sick of hearing the following argument advanced:
"Freedom of speech is not the right to offend"
YES, MOTHERFUCKERS, YES IT IS.
That is the point. If we were only free to say the non-offensive shit it wouldn't be a freedom that needs defending, now would it? And speech that can be "reacted" to by destroying your stuff is not particularly free, now is it?
It is either fundamental, down to the bone, or it's meaningless.
Re: Парадокс однако
Date: 2006-02-08 08:05 pm (UTC)